Evaluation of an educational exhibition on global issues and consumer responsibility: From involvement to hopelessness

Main Article Content

Jan Činčera

Abstract

The article presents the evaluation of an interactive exhibition for secondary education students (15-19 years old), focusing on global problems and consumer responsibility. The evaluation was conducted in three schools. Data were obtained from interviews with teachers (N=3) and questionnaires (N=204) distributed among students after the exhibition. For the analysis, both quantitative and qualitative approaches were used.

The results suggest that the exhibition was successful in terms of involving students and increasing their awareness of the problems. Some students evaluated the exhibition as manipulative. An unintended effect of the exhibition was students’ feeling of hopelessness. This article discusses the results and suggests a change in strategy when dealing with global problems in schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Činčera, J. (2013). Evaluation of an educational exhibition on global issues and consumer responsibility: From involvement to hopelessness. Envigogika, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.376
Section
Reviewed Papers
Author Biography

Jan Činčera

Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
Faculty of natural sciences, humanities and pedagogy
Technical University Liberec

Voroněžská 1329/13, 460 01 Liberec

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 50, 179-211

Bahk, C. M. (2011). Environmental Education Through Narrative Films: Impact of Medicine Man on Attitudes Towards Forest Preservation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42, 1, 1-13

Bamberg, S. & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25

Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting Students’ Car Use for University Routes With the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35, 2, 264-285

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215

Berenguer, J. (2007). The Effect of Empathy in Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 7, 269-283

Berenguer, J. (2008). The Effect of Empathy in Environmental Moral Reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42, 1, 110-134.

Boeve-de Pauq, J., Donche, V. & van Petegem, P. (2011). Adolescents’ environmental worldview and personality: An explonatory study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 109-117

Člověk v tísni (2012) Jeden svět na školách. Zpráva o dotazníkovém šetření na středních školách 2012 včetně porovnání s rokem 2009. Praha: Člověk v tísni, Millward Brown

Cordova, D. I. & Lepper, M.R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 4, 715-730

Eilam, E. & Trop, T. (2011). ESD Pedagogy: A Guide for the Perplexed. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42 (1), 43-64.

Fox, K. R. (2010). Children Making a Difference: Developing Awareness of Poverty Through Service Learning. The Social Studies, 101, 1-9

Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986-7). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior. A meta analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8

Hungerford, H. R. & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8-21

Kovalik, S. & Olsen, K.D. (1994). Kid’s eye view of science. A Teacher’s Handbook for Implementing an Integrated Thematic Approach to Teaching Science, K-6. Kent: Center for the Future of Public Education

Meinholed, J.L. & Malkus, A.J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Make a Difference? Environment and Behavior,37, 4, 511-532

Nagel, M. (2005). Constructing Apathy: How Environmentalism and Environmental Education May Be Fostering „Learned Hopelessness“ in Children. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 71-80

NaZemi (b.d.v.). Supermarket SVĚT. Interaktivní výstava.. Brno: NaZemi

Nolan, J. M. (2010). „An Inconvenient Truth“ Increases Knowledge, Concern, and Willingness to Reduce Greenhouse Gases. Environment and Behavior, 42, 5, 643-658

Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and Learning in Environmental Education: a critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7 (3), 207-320

Simmons, B. et al. (2009). Environmental Education Materials. Guidelines for Excellence. Washington: North American Association for Environmental Education

Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56,3,407-424.

Thapa, B. (1999). Environmentalism: The Relation of Environmental Attitudes and Environmentally Responsible Behaviors Among Undergraduate Students. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19, 5, 426-438

Yurttas, D.G. & Sülün, Y. (2010). What are the most important environmental problems according to the second grade primary school students? Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 1605-1609

Zia, A & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 6, 743-761

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.